🔗 Share this article

Jilly Cooper, who died suddenly at the 88 years old, racked up sales of 11m copies of her various sweeping books over her 50-year career in writing. Adored by all discerning readers over a specific age (45), she was introduced to a new generation last year with the Disney+ adaptation of Rivals.

The Rutshire Chronicles

Cooper purists would have preferred to see the Rutshire chronicles in chronological order: beginning with Riders, originally published in the mid-80s, in which Rupert Campbell-Black, rogue, philanderer, horse rider, is initially presented. But that’s a sidebar – what was notable about seeing Rivals as a box set was how well Cooper’s universe had aged. The chronicles encapsulated the 80s: the broad shoulders and bubble skirts; the obsession with class; nobility sneering at the Technicolored nouveau riche, both dismissing everyone else while they snipped about how room-temperature their champagne was; the sexual politics, with inappropriate behavior and misconduct so everyday they were almost personas in their own right, a pair you could rely on to drive the narrative forward.

While Cooper might have inhabited this era completely, she was never the proverbial fish not noticing the ocean because it’s ubiquitous. She had a empathy and an perceptive wisdom that you maybe wouldn’t guess from hearing her talk. All her creations, from the pet to the pony to her mother and father to her international student's relative, was always “utterly charming” – unless, that is, they were “completely exquisite”. People got harassed and more in Cooper’s work, but that was never condoned – it’s surprising how OK it is in many more highbrow books of the era.

Class and Character

She was well-to-do, which for real-world terms meant that her parent had to hold down a job, but she’d have characterized the strata more by their values. The middle-class people worried about every little detail, all the time – what society might think, mainly – and the upper classes didn’t care a … well “such things”. She was risqué, at times very much, but her dialogue was always refined.

She’d recount her upbringing in fairytale terms: “Daddy went to battle and Mother was terribly, terribly worried”. They were both absolutely stunning, participating in a lifelong love match, and this Cooper emulated in her own marriage, to a editor of war books, Leo Cooper. She was twenty-four, he was 27, the marriage wasn’t perfect (he was a philanderer), but she was consistently at ease giving people the secret for a successful union, which is creaking bed springs but (key insight), they’re noisy with all the laughter. He didn't read her books – he read Prudence once, when he had a cold, and said it made him feel worse. She took no offense, and said it was mutual: she wouldn’t be spotted reading war chronicles.

Constantly keep a journal – it’s very challenging, when you’re mid-twenties, to recall what twenty-four felt like

Early Works

Prudence (the late 70s) was the fifth book in the Romance series, which began with Emily in the mid-70s. If you approached Cooper in reverse, having commenced in Rutshire, the early novels, AKA “the books named after affluent ladies” – also Octavia and Harriet – were almost there, every protagonist feeling like a test-run for Rupert, every main character a little bit drippy. Plus, line for line (I can't verify statistically), there wasn’t as much sex in them. They were a bit uptight on matters of decorum, women always fretting that men would think they’re immoral, men saying outrageous statements about why they liked virgins (comparably, seemingly, as a true gentleman always wants to be the initial to unseal a tin of instant coffee). I don’t know if I’d recommend reading these books at a formative age. I believed for a while that that was what affluent individuals actually believed.

They were, however, remarkably precisely constructed, effective romances, which is considerably tougher than it sounds. You felt Harriet’s unwanted pregnancy, Bella’s pissy relatives, Emily’s loneliness in Scotland – Cooper could transport you from an hopeless moment to a lottery win of the soul, and you could not once, even in the beginning, pinpoint how she achieved it. One minute you’d be smiling at her highly specific depictions of the bed linen, the subsequently you’d have emotional response and no idea how they appeared.

Writing Wisdom

Inquired how to be a author, Cooper would often state the kind of thing that the literary giant would have said, if he could have been bothered to assist a aspiring writer: use all all of your faculties, say how things scented and seemed and audible and tactile and tasted – it greatly improves the narrative. But probably more useful was: “Forever keep a notebook – it’s very challenging, when you’re twenty-five, to recall what being 24 felt like.” That’s one of the initial observations you notice, in the longer, character-rich books, which have seventeen main characters rather than just one, all with extremely posh names, unless they’re American, in which case they’re called a simple moniker. Even an age difference of several years, between two siblings, between a gentleman and a woman, you can perceive in the speech.

The Lost Manuscript

The backstory of Riders was so pitch-perfectly typical of the author it can’t possibly have been real, except it absolutely is factual because London’s Evening Standard made a public request about it at the era: she wrote the whole manuscript in 1970, long before the Romances, took it into the West End and left it on a bus. Some context has been purposely excluded of this tale – what, for case, was so significant in the West End that you would abandon the unique draft of your manuscript on a bus, which is not that different from leaving your infant on a railway? Undoubtedly an assignation, but which type?

Cooper was wont to exaggerate her own chaos and clumsiness